Late pleistocene paleosol sequences as an instrument for the local paleographic reconstruction of the Kostenki 14 key section (Voronezh oblast) as an example

Eurasian Soil Science volume 43, pages876–892(2010)Cite this article

Abstract

A sequence of five paleosol units (with seven individual paleosol profiles) buried in the Late Pleistocene (20–40 ka) deposits was studied at the Kostenki 14 (K14) key section in Voronezh oblast with the use of a set of morphological, physicochemical, and instrumental methods. The upper-lying paleosols differed from the lower-lying paleosols in the less pronounced gley features, stronger aggregation of the soil material, more significant accumulation of carbonates, and higher percentage of calcium humates and fulvates. These features attested to the higher aridity of the paleoclimate and the development of the upper-lying paleosols under grassy vegetation. Within the studied paleosol sequence, the most developed profiles were typical of the soils that formed 27–32 ka ago during the Bryansk interstadial. The good aggregation, the presence of features left by the soil fauna activity, the high magnetic susceptibility, and the morphology of the secondary carbonates in the studied paleosols suggest that they were formed under meadow-steppe vegetation in well-drained positions and resembled modern cryoarid soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

34,95 €

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    A. L. Aleksandrovskii and E. I. Aleksandrovskaya, Soil Evolution and the Geographic Environment (Nauka, Moscow, 2005), 223 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    M. V. Anikovich, “On the Role of the Kostenki-Borshchevsk Area in the Modern Paleolithological Studies,” Peterb. Arkheolog. Vestn., No. 3, 3–19 (1993).

  3. 3.

    M. V. Anikovich, “The Origin of the Kostenki-Streletskaya Culture and the Problems of Cultural Genetic Relationships between the Mousterian Epoch and the Upper Paleolithic Epoch,” Arkheol., Etnogr. i Antropol. Evrazii, No. 3, p. 70–86 (2004) [in Russian].

  4. 4.

    A. F. Vadyunina and V. F. Babanin, “Magnetic Susceptibility of Some Soils of the Soviet Union,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 55–66 (1972).

  5. 5.

    M. F. Veklich, Stratigraphy of the Loess Formation in Ukraine and Neighboring Countries (Naukova dumka, Kiev, 1968). 237 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    A. A. Velichko, Geological Age of the Upper Paleolithic Period in Central Regions of the Russian Plain (Nauka, Moscow, 1961), 295 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    A. A. Velichko, “The Spitsyn Site (Kostenki XVII) and Its Meaning for Solving the Major Problems of Geology in the Kostenki-Borshevsk Region,” Mater. Issledov. Arkheolog., No. 121, 201–219 (1963).

  8. 8.

    A. A. Velichko and T. D. Morozova, “The Bryansk Paleosol, Its Stratigraphic Meaning, and the Environmental Conditions,” in Loess, Buried Soils, and Cryogenic Phenomena on the Russian Plain (Nauka, Moscow, 1972), pp. 44–54 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. A. Velichko, T. D. Morozova, and P. G. Panin, “Polygenetic Soil Complexes as Systematic Phenomena of Pleistocene Macrocycles,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 2, 113–123 (2007).

  10. 10.

    A. A. Velichko, V. V. Pisareva, S. N. Sedov, et al., “Paleogeography of Kostenki 14 Site (Markina Gora),” Arkheol., Etnogr. i Antropol. Evrazii, No 4, 35–50 (2009).

  11. 11.

    V. I. Volkovintser, Steppe Cryoarid Soils (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1978), 208 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    G. A. Vorob’eva, A. G. Sazonov, and O. S. Lykov, “Specificity of the Evolution of Chernozems in the Baikal Region,” in Problems of Soil Evolution (ONTI PNTs RAN, Pushchino, 2003), pp. 178–184 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    N. I. Glushankova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geography (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    N. I. Glushankova, Paleopedogenesis and the Natural Environment of Eastern Europe in the Pleistocene (Madzhenta, Moscow-Smolensk, 2008), 348 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    A. A. Gol’eva, Phytoliths and Their Information Role in the Study of Natural and Archaeological Objects (Moscow-Syktyvkar-Elista, 2001), 200 pp. [in Russian].

  16. 16.

    M. N. Grishchenko, Paleogeography of the Kostenki-Borshevsk Area in the Upper Paleolithic Epoch (KSI-IMK, Moscow, 1950), no. 31, 75–88 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    S. V. Gubin, “Buried Pleistocene Soils of the Paleolithic Site Korman’ IV in the Middle Dnester Reaches” (Nauka, Moscow, 1977), pp. 98–104 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    S. V. Gubin, “Paleopedological Analysis of Sediments at the Multilayered Site Molodova V,” in Multilayered Paleolithic Site Molodova V. People of the Stone Age and the Environment (Nauka, Moscow, 1987), pp. 133–141 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    L. A. Gugalinskaya, Soil Formation and Cryogenesis in the Center of the Russian Plain in the Late Pleistocene (ONTI NTsBI AN SSSR, Pushchino, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    L. A. Gugalinskaya and V. M. Alifanov, “Fossil Soils of the Middle Pleistocene and Specific Features of Pedogenesis according to the Materials from the Sungir Site,” in The Late Paleolithic Site Sungir (Burial Places and the Environment) (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 1998), pp. 219–239 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    L. A. Gugalinskaya, L. A. Ivannikova, V. M. Alifanov, and N. A. Antoshechkina, “Pedocyclites in Gray Forest and Buried Bryansk Soils of the Vladimir Opol’e and Biological Methods of Their Diagnostics,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 1157–1169 (2001) [Eur. Soil Sci. 34 (10), 1031–1042 (2001)].

  22. 22.

    V. A. Demkin and T. S. Demkina, “Archaeological Pedology at the Beginning of the Third Millennium,” in Problems of Soil Evolution (ONTI PNTs RAN, Pushchino, 2003), pp. 29–34 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    M. I. Dergacheva, Archaeological Pedology (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1997), 228 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    M. I. Dergacheva, “The Pedohumus Method of the Diagnostics of Paleoclimates,” in Problems of the Climatic Reconstruction of Pleistocene and Holocene in Siberia (Inst. Agrokh. i Pochvoved. SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 1998), pp. 132–142 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    A. E. Dodonov, “The Quaternary Period in Central Asia: Stratigraphy, Correlation, and Paleogeography,” Tr. Geol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk (GEOS, Moscow, 2002), Vol. 546, 250 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    A. M. Kuznetsova and O. S. Khokhlova, “Morphology of Carbonate Accumulations in Soils of Various Types,” Litol. Polezn. Iskop. 56(1), 99–110 (2010) [Lithol. Miner. Resour. 45 (1), 89–100 (2010)].

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    G. I. Lazukov, “Geology of Archaelogical Sites in the Kostenki-Borshchevsk Region,” Mater. Issledov. Arkheolog., No. 59, 135–173 (1957).

  28. 28.

    S. N. Lisitsyn, “Chronostratigraphy of the Borshchevo 5 Key Site according to the Results of Excavation Works in 2002 and 2003,” in Kostenki and the Early Paleolithic Period of Eurasia: Common and Local Features (Istoki, Voronezh, 2004), pp. 66–79 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    G. I. Makhonina and I. N. Korkina, The Development of Podzolic Soils on Archaeological Monuments of Western Siberia (Akademkniga, Yekaterinburg, 2002), 263 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    T. D. Morozova, Evolution of the Soil Cover of Europe in the Late Pleistocene (Nauka, Moscow, 1981), 281 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    D. S. Orlov and L. A. Grishina, Practicum in Humus Chemistry (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1981), 272 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    A. A. Sinitsyn, “Lower Cultural Layers at Kostenki 14 (Markina Gora) Key Site (Excavations of 1998–2001),” in Specificity of the Upper Paleolithic Period in Eastern Europe (Akademprint, St. Petersburg, 2002), pp. 219–236 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    S. A. Sycheva, “On the Geography and Development of the Mezinsk Complex on the Oka-Don Plain,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 26–37 (1985).

  34. 34.

    S. A. Sycheva, “Pedological Materials,” in Paleoenvironment of the Paleolithic Period on Plains N. B. Leonova, S. A. Nesmeyanov, E. A. Vinogradova, et al. (Novyi Mir, Moscow, 2006), pp. 85–100 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    S. A. Sycheva, “Specificity of the Paleopedological and Microfacies Analyses of Covering Deposits at the Late Paleolithic Sites,” in Cultural Layers of Archaeological Monuments: Theory, Methods, and Study Practices. Conference Materials (IG RAN, IA RAN, NIA-Priroda, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    S. A. Sycheva, “Evolutionary Analysis of Small Erosional Landforms Buried in The Pleistocene Sediments,” Geomorfologiya, No. 3, 27–38 (1996).

  37. 37.

    S. A. Sycheva, “Evolution of Buried Balka Landscapes in the Forest-Steppe Zone of the Russian Plain,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 1, 113–123 (2003).

  38. 38.

    O. S. Khokhlova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geography (IG RAN, Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    O. S. Khokhlova, A. M. Kuznetsova, A. A. Khokhlov, et al., “Paleosols Buried under Kurgans of the Pit-Grave Culture in the Steppe Zone of the Cis-Ural Region,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 481–490 (2008) [Eur. Soil Sci. 41 (5), 481–490 (2008)].

  40. 40.

    Yu. G. Chendev, Natural Evolution of Soils in the Central Forest-Steppe in the Holocene (Belgorod Gos. Univ., Belgorod, 2004), 200 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    M. V. Anikovich, A. A. Sinitsyn, J. F. Hoffecker, et al., “Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and Implications for the Dispersal of Modern Humans,” Science 315, 223–226 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    P. Antoine, D.-D. Rousseau, L. Zöller, et al., “High-Resolution Record of the Last Interglacial-Glacial Cycle in the Nussloch Loess-Palaeosol Sequences, Upper Rhine Area, Germany,” Quat. Int. 76/77, 211–229 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    G. C. Bond and R. Lotti, “Iceberg Discharges into the North Atlantic on Millennial Time Scales during the Last Glaciation,” Science 267, 1005–1010 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    W. Dansgaard, S. J. Johnsen, H. B. Clausen, et al., “Evidence for General Instability of Past Climate from a 250-kyr Ice-Core Record,” Nature 364, 218–220 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    M. De Angelis, J. P. Steffensen, M. R. Legrand, et al., “Primary Aerosol (Sea Salt and Soil Dust) Deposited in Greenland Ice During the Last Climatic Cycle: Comparison with East Antarctic Records,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 26681–26698 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    M. Frechen, “Upper Pleistocene Loess Stratigraphy in Southern Germany,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 18, 243–269 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    P. Haesaerts and B. Van Vliet-Lano, “Phénoménes Périglaciaires et Sols Fossiles Observés Maisiéres-Canal, a Harmignies et a Rocourt,” Biultyn. peryglacalny 28, 291–324 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    P. Haesaerts, F. Damblon, A. Sinitsyn, and J. van der Plicht, “Kostienki 14 (Voronezh, Central Russia): New Data on Stratigraphy and Radiocarbon Chronology,” in Acts of the XIV UISPP Congress, University of Liege. General Sessions and Posters, BAR Int. Ser. (Liege, Belgium, 2004), pp. 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    V. T. Holliday, J. F. Hoffecker, P. Goldberg, et al., “Geoarchaeology of the Kostenki-Borshchevo Sites, Don River Valley, Russia,” Geoarchaeology: An Int. J. 22(2), 181–228 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    O. S. Khokhlova, “Morphology of Pedogenic Carbonate Accumulations in the Holocene Soil Chronosequences of the Chernozem’ and Kastanozem’ Zones of Russia,” Geophys. Res. Abstr. 7(03914) (2005).

  51. 51.

    F. Oldfield and J. Crowther, “Establishing Fire Incidence in Temperate Soils Using Magnetic Measurements,” Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 249, 362–369 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    B. Ortega-Guerrero, S. Sedov, E. Solleiro-Rebolledo, and A. Soler, “Magnetic Mineralogy in Barranca Tlalpan Exposure Paleosols, Tlaxcala, Mexico,” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 21(1), 120–132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    A. V. Rusakov, M. A. Korkka, P. P. Kerzum, and A. N. Simakova, “Paleosols in the Moraine-Mantle Loam Sequence of Northeastern Europe: The Memory of Pedogenesis Rates and Evolution of the Environment during OIS3,” Catena 71, 456–466 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    A. A. Sinitsyn and J. F. Hoffecker, “Radiocarbon Dating and Chronology of the Early Upper Paleolithic at Kostenki,” Quat. Int. 152/153, 175–185 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    V. O. Targulian and S. V. Goryachkin, “Soil Memory: Types of Record, Carriers, Hierarchy and Diversity,” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 21, 1–8 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    B. Van Vliet-Lano, “Le Pédocomplexe De Warneton. Ou en Est-On?,” Bilan Paléopédologique et Micro-Morphologique, Quaternaire 1, 65–76 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, San Antonio, C.P. 04510, D.F., Mexico

    S. N. Sedov & E. Solleiro

  2. Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, 142290, Russia

    O. S. Khokhlova

  3. Institute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Dvortsovaya 18, St. Petersburg, 119186, Russia

    A. A. Sinitsyn

  4. Faculty of Biology and Soil Science, St. Petersburg State University, nab. Universitetskaya 7/9, St. Petersburg, 119186, Russia

    M. A. Korkka & A. V. Rusakov

  5. Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, San Antonio, C.P. 04510, D.F., Mexico

    B. Ortega

  6. Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    M. S. Rozanova

  7. Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    A. M. Kuznetsova

  8. Fedorovskii All-Russia Institute of Mineral Resources (VIMS), per. Staromonetnyi 31, Moscow, 119017, Russia

    A. A. Kazdym

Authors
  1. S. N. Sedov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. S. Khokhlova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. A. Sinitsyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Korkka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. V. Rusakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. Solleiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. S. Rozanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. M. Kuznetsova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. A. A. Kazdym
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Sedov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.N. Sedov, O.S. Khokhlova, A.A. Sinitsyn, M.A. Korkka, A.V. Rusakov, B. Ortega, E. Solleiro, M.S. Rozanova, A.M. Kuznetsova, A.A. Kazdym, 2010, published in Pochvovedenie, 2010, No. 8, pp. 938–955.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sedov, S.N., Khokhlova, O.S., Sinitsyn, A.A. et al. Late pleistocene paleosol sequences as an instrument for the local paleographic reconstruction of the Kostenki 14 key section (Voronezh oblast) as an example. Eurasian Soil Sc. 43, 876–892 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229310080053

Download citation

Keywords

  • Humus
  • EURASIAN Soil Science
  • Late Pleistocene
  • Soil Mass
  • Marine Isotope Stage