Temperature regimes of northern taiga soils in the isolated permafrost zone of Western Siberia

Abstract

Soil temperature regimes were studied in three ecosystems of the north of Western Siberia in the zone of isolated permafrost: the forest ecosystem with gleyic loamy sandy podzol (Stagnic Albic Podzol), the flat-topped peat mound ecosystem with humus-impregnated loamy sandy to light loamy peat cryozem (Histic Oxyaquic Turbic Cryosol (Arenic)), and the peat mound (palsa) ecosystem with oligotrophic destructive permafrost-affected peat soil (Cryic Histosol). Annual temperature measurements in the soil profiles demonstrated that these soils function under different temperature regimes: very cold permafrost regime and cold nonpermafrost regime. The following annual temperature characteristics proved to be informative for the studied soils: sums of above-zero temperatures at the depths of 10 and 20 cm, the maximum depth of penetration of temperatures above 10°C, and the number of days with daily soil temperatures above (or below) 0°C at the depth of 20 cm. On the studied territory, the insulating effect of the snow cover in winter was at least two times more pronounced than the insulating effect of the vegetation cover in summer. Cryogenic soils of the studied region are characterized by the high buffering towards changing climatic parameters. This is explained by the presence of the litter and peat horizons with a very low thermal diffusivity and by the presence of permafrost at a relatively shallow depth with temperature gradients preventing penetration of heat to the permafrost table.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    S. S. Bykhovets, V. A. Sorokovikov, R. A. Martuganov, V. G. Mamykin, and D. A. Gilichinskii, “Long-term observations of soil temperatures within the network of Russian meteorological stations,” Kriosfera Zemli 11 (1), 7–20 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    V. D. Vasil’evskaya, V. V. Ivanov, and L. G. Bogatyrev, Soils of the North of Western Siberia (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    O. Yu. Goncharova, G. V. Matyshak, A. A. Bobrik, and N. G. Moskalenko, “Production of carbon dioxide by soils of northern taiga of Western Siberia (Nadym Station),” Kriosfera Zemli, No. 2, 66–71 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    V. N. Dimo, “Zonal and provincial specificity of soil temperatures in the Soviet Union and classification of soil temperature regimes,” in Thermal and Water Regime of Soils in the Soviet Union (Nauka, Moscow, 1968), pp. 5–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    V. N. Dimo, Thermal Regime of Soils in the Soviet Union (Kolos, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    G. V. Dobrovolsky and I. S. Urusevskaya, Geography of Soils (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

  8. 8.

    Multiple Monitoring of Northern Taiga Geosystems of Western Siberia, Ed. by V. P. Mel’nikov (Geo, Novosibirsk, 2012) [in Russian].

  9. 9.

    A. I. Kulikov, V. I. Dugarov, and V. M. Korsunov, Permafrost Soils: Ecology, Thermal Properties, and Prediction of Productivity (Buryat Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    G. G. Mazhitova, “Soil temperature regimes in the discontinuous permafrost zone in the east European Russian arctic,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41 (1), 48–62 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    G. V. Matyshak, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    A. V. Pavlov and N. G. Moskalenko, “Thermal regime of soil in the north of Western Siberia,” Kriosfera Zemli 5 (2), 11–19 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Field and Laboratory Methods to Study Physical Properties and Regimes of Soils, Ed. by E. V. Shein (Moscow State University, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

  14. 14.

    A. K. Shkadova, Temperature Regime of Soils in the Soviet Union (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    J. Apaloo, A. Brenning, and X. Bodin, “Interactions between seasonal snow cover, ground surface temperature and topography (Andes of Santiago, Chile, 33.5 S),” Permafrost Periglacial Process, No. 23, 277–291 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    C. R. Burn and C. A. S. Smith, “Observations of the’ thermal offset’ in near-surface mean annual ground temperatures at several sites near Mayo, Yukon Territory, Canada,” Arctic 41 (2), 99–104 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    N. Cannone and M. Guglielmin, “Influence of vegetation on the ground thermal regime in continental Antarctica,” Geoderma 151, 215–223 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    M. Guglielmin, C. J. Ellis-Evans, and N. Cannone, “Active layer thermal regime under different vegetation conditions in permafrost areas. A case study at Signy Island (Maritime Antarctica),” Geoderma 144, 73–85 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    E. S. F. Heggem, B. Etzelmüller, S. Anarmaa, N. Sharkhuu, C. E. Goulden, and B. Nandinsetseg, “Spatial distribution of ground surface temperatures and active layer depths in the Hövsgöl area, northern Mongolia,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes 17 (4), 357–369 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    K. M. Hinkel and S. I. Outcalt, “Identification of heat transfer processes during soil cooling, freezing, and thawing in Central Alaska,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes, No. 5, 217–235 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    K. M. Hinkel, A. E. Klene, and F. E. Nelson, “Spatial and interannual patterns of winter N-Factors Near Barrow,” in Proceedings Alaska International Conference on Permafrost (ICOP), 2008, pp. 705–709.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    K. M. Hinkel, S. I. Outcalt, and F. E. Nelson, “Nearsurface summer heat-transfer regimes at adjacent permafrost and non-permafrost sites in Central Alaska,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Permafrost (Beijing, China, 1993), p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Seasonal snow cover, ice, and permafrost,” in Climate Change: The IPCC Impacts Assessment, Ed. by W. J. Tegart, G. W. Sheldon, and D. C. Griffiths (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    A. Kade, V. E. Romanovsky, and D. A. Walker, “The N-factor of nonsorted circles along a climate gradient in Arctic Alaska,” Permafrost Periglacial Process, No. 17, 279–289 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    A. E. Klene, F. E. Nelson, and N. I. Shiklomanov, “The N-factor in natural landscapes: variability of air and soil-surface temperatures, Kuparuk River basin, Alaska,” Arct., Antarct. Alp. Res. 33 (2), 140–148 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    V. J. Lunardini, “Theory of n-factors and correlation of data,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Permafrost, Edmonton, Alberta (National Research Council of Ottawa, Canada, 1978), No. 1, pp. 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    P. D. Morse, C. R. Burn, and S. V. Kokelj, “Near-surface ground-ice distribution, Kendall Island Bird Sanctuary, western Arctic coast, Canada,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes 20 (2), 155–171 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    T. E. Osterkamp and V. E. Romanovsky, “Comments on permafrost monitoring and detection of climate change,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes, No. 9, 87–89 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    V. E. Romanovsky and T. E. Osterkamp, “Inter annual variations of the thermal regime of the active layer and near surface permafrost in Northern Alaska,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes, No. 6, 313–335 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    N. I. Shiklomanov, O. A. Anisimov, T. Zhang, S. Marchenko, F. E. Nelson, and C. Oelke, “Comparison of model-produced active layer fields: Results for northern Alaska,” J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 112, 02S10 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    M. W. Smith and D. W. Riseborough, “Climate and the limits of permafrost: a zonal analysis,” Permafrost Periglacial Processes 13 (1), 1–15 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    H. Tabuchi and M. Seppälä, “Surface temperature inversion in the palsa and pounu fields of northern Finland,” Polar Sci. 6 (3), 237–251 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    J. Throop, A. G. Lewkowicz, and S. L. Smith, “Climate and ground temperature relations at sites across the continuous and discontinuous permafrost zones, northern Canada,” Can. J. Earth Sci. 49 (8), 865–876 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Word Reference Base for Soil Resources (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014), No. 106.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Yu. Goncharova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.Yu. Goncharova, G.V. Matyshak, A.A. Bobrik, N.G. Moskalenko, O.E. Ponomareva, 2015, published in Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 12, pp. 1462–1473.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goncharova, O.Y., Matyshak, G.V., Bobrik, A.A. et al. Temperature regimes of northern taiga soils in the isolated permafrost zone of Western Siberia. Eurasian Soil Sc. 48, 1329–1340 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315100038

Download citation

Keywords

  • annual soil temperature characteristics
  • climate change
  • cryogenic soils
  • thermal diffusivity
  • peatlands
  • N-factor
  • Stagnic Albic Podzol
  • Histic Oxyaquic Turbic Cryosol (Arenic)
  • Cryic Histosol