Specific features of the morphology and chemical properties of coarse-textured postagrogenic soils of the southern taiga, Kostroma oblast

Abstract

The properties of loamy sandy postagrogenic soils in the course of their natural overgrowing were studied in the southeastern part of Kostroma oblast. Micromorphological indications of tillage were preserved in these soils at least 35–40 years after the cessation of their agricultural use. In the course of the soil overgrowing with forest vegetation, the bulk density of the upper part of the former plow horizon decreased, the pH and the ash content of the litter horizon somewhat lowered with a simultaneous increase in the acidity of the upper mineral horizon, especially at the beginning of the formation of the tree stand. In 5–7 years after the cessation of tillage, the former plow horizon was differentiated with respect to the organic carbon content. The total pool of organic carbon in the upper 30 cm increased. In the course of the further development, in the postagrogenic soil under the 90to 100-year-old forest, the organic carbon pool in this layer became lower. The soil of the young fallow (5–7 years) was characterized by the higher values of the microbial biomass in the upper mineral horizon in comparison with that in the plowed soil. In general, the microbial biomass in the studied postagrogenic ecosystems (the soils of the fields abandoned in 2005 and 2000 and the soil under the secondary 40-year-old forest) was lower than that in the soil of the subclimax 90to 100-year-old forest. The enzymatic activity of the soils tends to increase during the succession. The restoration of the invertase and, partly, catalase activities to the values typical of the soils under mature forests takes place in about 40 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    O. A. Antsiferova, “Dynamics of fertility parameters of faw lands in Kaliningrad oblast,” Agrokhim. Vestn., No. 2, 2–4 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    N. D. Ananyeva, E. V. Stolnikova, E. A. Susyan, and A. K. Khodzhaeva, “The fun and bacterial biomass (selective inhibition) and the production of CO2 and N2O by soddy-podzolic soils of postagrogenic biogeocenoses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (11), 1287–1293 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    N. D. Ananyeva, E. A. Susyan, E. V. Stolnikova, I. M. Ryzhova, and E. O. Bocharnikova, “Microbial biomass carbon and the microbial carbon dioxide production by soddy-podzolic soils in postagrogenic biogeocsis and in native spruce forests of the southern taiga (Kostroma oblast),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42 (9), 1029–1037 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    D. P. Andreev, S. N. Chukov, and V. V. Yakovleva, “Transformation of arable horizons of the fallow soddypodzolic soils on the sand soil-forming minerals,” in Proceedings of the IV Congress of the Dokuchaev Soil Science Society “Soils as the National Treasure of Russia” (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 2004), Book 1, p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    B. F. Aparin and A. M. Vasil’ev, “Morphological and sicochemical features of fallow soddy-podzolic soils on the two-layered substrates in Norod oblast,” in Agricultural Transformation of Soils in the Nonchernozemic Zone (Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Moscow, 1981), pp. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    E. Arinushkina, Manual on the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O. Yu. Baranova, G. B. Nome, and M. N. Stroganova, “Changes in the properties of arable soddy-podzolic soils after afforestation,” in Soil-Formation in Forest Biogeocenosises (Nauka, Moscow, 1989), pp. 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    L. G. Bogatyrev, “Classification of forest litters,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 118–127 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    L. G. Bogatyrev, V. V. Demin, G. V. Matyshak, and V. A. Sapozhnikova, “Some theoretical aspects of the study of forest lirs,” Lesovedenie, No. 4, 17–29 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    L. G. Bogatyrev, I. A. Sentitskii, R. N. Sharafutdinov, and A. A. Stepanov, “Forest litters and the diagnostics of the modern trend in humus formation in different geographical zones,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 31 (7), 787–796 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    S. I. Bolysov and Yu. N. Fuzeina, “Physical and geographical conditions of Kostroma area (Trans-Volga region): geological and geomorphologic structure,” in Kostroma Trans-Volga Region: Nature and a Man (Moscow, 2001), pp. 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    A. S. Vladychenskii, V. M. Telesnina, K. A. Rumyantseva, and T. A. Chalaya, “Organic matter and biological activity of postagrogenic soils in the southern taiga using the example of Kostroma oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (5) 518–529 (2013). doi: 10.7868/S0032180x1305016x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    A. S. Vladychey, V. M. Telesnina, and T. A. Chalaya, “Influence of fallen plant leaves on the bioical activity of postagrogenic soils of southern taiga,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 67 (1), 1–7 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    D. G. Zamolodchv, A. I. Utkin, and G. N. Korovin, “Determination of carbon reserves using conversionvolume coefficients dependent on the age of plantations,” Lesovedenie, No. 3, 84–93 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    A. E. Ivanova, A. A. Karlsen, and O. E. Marfenina, “Properties of microbiota of postagrogenic soddy-podzolic soils (after overgrowing by woody plants)”, in Ecological Functions of Forest Soils in Natural and Disturbed Landscapes (Institute of Problems ofdustrial Ecology, Apatity, 2011), Part 1, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    N. A. Kachinskii, Soil Physics (Vyssa Shkola, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    I. O. Kechaikina, A. G. Ryumin, and S. N. Chukov, “Postagrogenic transformation of organic matter in soddy-podzolic soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (10), 1077–1089 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian]

  19. 19.

    I. N. Kurganova and V. N. Kudeyarov, “Assessment of carbon dioxide effluxes from soils of the taiga zone of Russia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 31 (9), 954–965 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    I. N. Kurganova, V. O. Lopes de Gerenyu, A. Z. Shvidenko, and P. M. Sapozhnikov, “Changes in theganic carbon pool of abandoned soils in Russia (1990–2004),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (3), 333–340 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    A. V. Litvinovich, “Postagrogenic evolution of intensively cultivated soddy-podzolic soils in the west of the nonchernozemic zone,” Agrokhimiya, No. 7, 85–93 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    A. V. Litvinovich, O. Yu. Pavlovand D. V. Chernov, “Changes in the humus status of soddy-podzolic soils after anthropogenic influence,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. S-kh. Nauk, No. 6, 26–28 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    A. V. Litvinovich and I. A. Plynova, “Changes in the acid–base properties of soddy-podzolic loamy soil in the course of its postagrogenic evolution,” Scientific Support of Reforms in the Agroindustrial Complex (Maksi-Print, St. Petersburg, 2009), pp. 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    V. T. Lobkov, “Biodiversity in agroecosystems as a factor optimizing the biological activity of soil,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 32 (6), 664–668 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    D. I. Lyuri, S. V. Goryachkin, N. A. Karavaeva, E. A. Denisenko, and T. G. Nefedova, Development of Agricultural Lands ofssia in the 20th Century and Postagrogenic Recovery of Vegetation and Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    I. B. Makarov, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Methods of the Study of logical Turnover in Different Natural Zones (Mysl’, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].

  28. 28.

    Methods of Soil Miciology and Biochemistry (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

  29. 29.

    M. F. Ovchinnikova, I. A. Perova, O. V. Kareva, and O. A. Makarov, “Changes in the properties of arable soddy-podzolic soil in postagrogenic period,” Agrokhim. Vestn., No. 1, 2–5 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    G. N. Ogureeva, Botanical and Geographic Zoning of the Soviet Union (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    V. K. Pestryak Cultivation of Soils in the Northwest (Kolos, Leningrad, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    A. A. Romanovskaya, V. N. Korotkov, R. T. Karaban’, and N. S. Smirnov, “Dynamics of carbon balance components in fallow arable lands on the Valdai Upla” Russ. J. Ecol. 43 (5), 373–377 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    A. N. Rybakova and O. A. Sorokina, “Assessment of parameters of fertility of fallow postagrogenic soils under their different uses,” Plodorodie, No. 3(72), 31–33 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    E. B. Skvortsova, O. Yu. Baranova, and G. B. Numerov, “Changes in the microfabric of soils after overgrowing of arable land with forest,” Pochvovedenie, No. 9, 101–109 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    O. A. Sorokina, “Diagnostic parameters of soil formation in gray forest soils of abandoned fields overgrowing with pine forests in the middle reaches of the Angara River,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (8), 867–875 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    O. A. Sorokina and N. D. Sorokin, “The influence of pifor forests of different ages on the biological activity of layland soils in the middle Angara River basin,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 40 (5), 569–575 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    V. M. Telesnina, I. E. Vaganov, E. Yu. Klimovich, and T. A. Chalaya, “The distinctive features of biological turnover in postagrogenic ecosystems of the south taiga and their effects on the chemical properties and biological activities of soils,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 68 (2), 90–98 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    V. V. Tokavchuk, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Krasnoyarsk, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    A. D. Fokin, I. L. Chernikova, L. Sh. Ibragimov, and Kh. Kh. Syunyaev “Role of the plant remains in supply of the plants with ash elements on podzolic soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 6, 53–61 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    T. A. Chalaya, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    D. V. Chernov and M. V. Vasil’ev “The content and forms of phosphorous mineral compounds in soddypodzolic loamy soils after postagrogenic transformation,” Izv. S.-Peterb. Gos. Agrar. Univ., No. 19, 102–106 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    D. V. Chernov and E. L. Kirill, “ Specific morphology of soddy-podzolic virgin, arable, and fallow soils,” in Humus and Soil-Formation (St. Petersburg State Agricultural University, St. Petersburg, 2000), pp. 45–152.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 11 (3), 215–221 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    H. P. Collins, E. T. Elliot, K. Paustian, L. G. Bundy, W. A. Dick, D. R. Huggins, A. J. M. Smucker, and E. A. Paul, “Soil carbon pools and fluxes in long-term corn belt agroecosystems,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 157–168 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    U. Falkengren-Gre, D.-J. ten Brink, and J. Brunet, “Land use effects on soil N, P, C and pH persist over 40–80 years of forest growth on agricultural soils,” For. Ecol. Manage. 225 74–81 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    T. D. Hooker and J. E. Compton, “Forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen accumulation during the first century after agricultural abandonment,” Ecol. Appl. 13 (2), 99–313 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    O. Kalinina, S. V. Goryachkin, N. A. Karavaeva, D. I. Lyuri, L. Najdenko, and L. Giani, “Self-restoration of post-agrogenic sandy soils in the southern taiga of Russia: soil development, nutrient status, and carbon dynamics,” Geoderma 152, 35–42 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    S. J. Morris, S. Bohm, S. Haile-Mariam, and E. A. Paul, “Evaluation of carbon accrual in afforested agricultural soils,” Global Change Biol. 13, 1145–1156 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    E. A. Paul, S. J. Morris, J. Six, K. Paustian, and E.G. Gregorich, “Interpretation of soil car-bon and nitrogen dynamics in agricultural and afforested soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67, 1620–1628 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    H. Smal and M. Olszewska, “The effect of afforestation with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) of sandy post arable soils on their selected properties. II. Reaction, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus,” Plant Soil 305, 171–187 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    L. Vesterdal, E. Ritter, and P. Gunders “Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land,” For. Ecol. Manage. 169, 137–147 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    N. Vuichard, P. Ciais, L. Belelli, P. Smith, and R. Valentini, “Carbon sequestration due to the abandonment of agriculture in the former USSR since 1990,” Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB4018 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Telesnina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.M. Telesnina, I.E. Vaganov, A.A. Karlsen, A.E. Ivanova, M.A. Zhukov, S.M. Lebedev, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 1, pp. 115–129.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Telesnina, V.M., Vaganov, I.E., Karlsen, A.A. et al. Specific features of the morphology and chemical properties of coarse-textured postagrogenic soils of the southern taiga, Kostroma oblast. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 102–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316010117

Download citation

Keywords

  • postagrogenic soils
  • fallow soils
  • carbon
  • biological activity
  • succession
  • enzymatic activity of soil