P. S. Bragina, M. I. Gerasimova
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia, 119991, Moscow, Leninskiye Gory, 1
Classification of surface bodies on technogenic parent materials is rather disputable. On one hand, the technogenic surface bodies (TSB) are predecessors of soils, on the other hand – they are made by humans, hence, differ of the natural soils by their origin. In the Russian soil classification system (versions of 2004 and 2008), the TSBs are subdivided by the kinds of human activities responsible for their formation. Moreover, the taxonomy of TSBs is a separate system beyond the soil classification, and the names of its objects are artificial and deliberately cumbersome in order to emphasize their “non-soil” essence. This system was invented by Valentin Tonkonogov, and it comprises two hierarchical levels, namely, groups and subgroups. In accordance with this system, an attempt was made to classify TSBs on coal dumps and iron ore mine tailings located in two landscape zones: forest-steppe and aspen-fir taiga in Kemerovo oblast. A third taxonomic level – “triba” – is proposed, with chemical and morphological properties of technogenic materials as differentiating criteria.
Key words: soil classification, non-soils, technogenic materials, mining industry wastes
Citation: Bragina P. S., Gerasimova M. I. Technogenic surface bodies on dumps of coal quarries and ore mine tailings in Kemerovo oblast: essay on classification, Byulleten Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2017, Vol. 89, pp. 90-103. doi: 10.19047/0136-1694-2017-89-90-103
REFERENCES
1. Androkhanov V.A., Kulyapina E.D., Kurachev V.M. Soils of technogenic landscapes: genesis and evolution, Novosibirsk, Publ. Izdat. SB RAS, 2004, 149 p. (in Russian)
2. Aparin B.F., Sukhacheva E.Yu. Principles of classification of soils in urban areas (by the example of St. Petersburg), Dokl. All-Russia. Sci. Conf. "Geochemistry of landscapes and geography of soils" (to the 100th anniversary of MA Glazovskaya), Moscow, 2012, pp.43-45. (in Russian)
3. Barannik L.P., Shmonov A.M. Reclamation of lands, Kemerovo, 1988. 56 p. (in Russian)
4. Berlyakova O.G., Dvurechenskii V.G., Toporovskaya A.A. Soil-ecological state of technogenic landscapes of Novokuznetsk industrial site, Biological reclamation and monitoring of disturbed lands: materials IX Vseros. Sci. Conf. Ekaterinburg, 2012, pp. 26-31. (in Russian)
5. Gennadiev A.N., Solntseva N.P., Gerasimova M.I. On the principles of grouping and nomenclature of technogenic soils, Pochvovedenie. 1992. № 2, pp. 49-60. (in Russian)
6. Humus formation in technogenic ecosystems / Ed. Kovalev R.V. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986. 167 p. (in Russian)
7. Goryachkin S.V., Gilichinskii D.A., Mergelov N.S. et al. Soils of Antarctica: first results, problems and prospects, Dokl. All-Russia. Sci. Conf. "Geochemistry of landscapes and geography of soils" (to the 100th anniversary of M.A. Glazovskaya), Moscow, 2012, pp. 365-392. (in Russian)
8. Classification and diagnostics of soils in Russia. Smolensk: Oykumena, 2004. 235 p. (in Russian)
9. Kurachev V.M., Androkhanov V.A. Classification of soils of man-made landscapes, Siberian Ecological J., 2002, № 3, pp. 255-261. (in Russian)
10. Lebedeva I.I., Tonkonogov V.D., Shishov L.L. Classification situation and taxonomy of anthropogenically transformed soils, Pochvovedenie, 1993, No. 9, pp. 98-106. (in Russian)
11. Pankova E.I., Vorob'eva L.A., Gadzhiev I.M., Saline soils in Russia, Moscow, Publ. Akademkniga, 2006, 857 p. (in Russian)
12. Field guide for Russian soils, Moscow, Publ. Soil. Institute of. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2008, 182 p. (in Russian)
13. Prokof'eva T.V., Gerasimova M.I., Bezuglova O.S., Bakhmatova K.A., Gol'eva A.A., Gorbov S.N., Zharikova E.A., Matinyan N.N., NakvasinaE.N., Sivtseva N.E. Inclusion of Soils and Soil-Like Bodies of Urban Territories into the Russian Soil Classification System, Eurasian Soil Science, 2014, V. 47 (10), pp. 959-967. doi: 10.1134/S1064229314100093
14. Stolboushkin A.Yu. Wall ceramic materials of matrix structure on the basis of non-caking low-plastic technogenic and natural raw materials: Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Novosibirsk, 2014, 42 pp. (in Russian)
15. Stroganova M.N., Myagkova A.D., Prokof'eva T.V. Soil. City. Ecology, Moscow, 1997, 320 pp. (in Russian)
16. Taranov S.A., Klevenskaya I.A., Shcherbatenko V.I., Barannik L.P., Yudina K.V. On Primary Soil Formation on Natural Overgrown Dumps of the Baidaevsky Coal Mine, Problems of Land Reclamation in the USSR, Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1974, pp. 196-204. (in Russian)
17. Tonkonogov V.D. Evolutionary-genetic classification of soils and Technogenic surface formations, Pochvovedenie, 2001, № 6, pp. 653-659. (in Russian)
18. Fridland V.M. Basic principles and elements of the basic classification of soils and the program of work on its creation, M., 1982, 149 p. (in Russian)
19. Demas P., Rabenhorst M.C. Subaqueous Soils: Pedogenesis in a Submerged Environment, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, V. 63, pp.1250–1257.
20. Huot H., Simmonot M.-O., Morel J.L. Pedogenetic trends in soils formed in technogenic parent materials, Soil Science. 2015, V. 180, pp.1–24.
21. IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
22. Leguédois S., Séré G., Auclerc A., Cortet J., Huot H., Ouvrard S., Watteau F., Schwartz C., Morel J.L. Modelling pedogenesis of Technosols, Geoderma. 2016, V. 262, pp.199–212.
23. Uzarowicz Ł., Skiba S. Technogenic soils developed on mine spoils containing iron sulphides: Mineral transformations as an indicator of pedogenesis, Geoderma, 2011, V. 163, Iss. 1–2, pp. 95–108.
